QUANDO UM NÃO SABE, DOIS NÃO LITIGAM? O CASO DAS ILHAS MARSHALL CONTRA OS ESTADOS DETENTORES DE ARMAS NUCLEARES | DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2018v73p605
Resumo
O trabalho estuda o caso “Obrigações referentes a Negociações para a Cessação da Corrida por Armas Nucleares e para o Desarmamento Nuclear”, julgado pela Corte Internacional de Justiça em 2016. Muito embora não tenha prosseguido para a fase de decisão de mérito, ele é significativo por estabelecer uma nova exigência para a admissão de um caso para julgamento. O presente artigo critica o acórdão a partir de sua coerência interna, do direito positivo aplicável à determinação da jurisdição da CIJ e dos precedentes relevantes. Conclui-se que a Corte afastou-se de sua jurisprudência sobre a identificação de uma disputa ao proferir uma decisão que não prestigia o acesso à justiça.Referências
Doutrina:
BECKER, Michael A. The dispute that wasn’t there: judgments in the Nuclear Disarmament cases at the International Court of Justice. Cambridge International Law Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017).
BIANCHI, Andrea. Choice and (the Awareness of) its Consequences: the ICJ’S ‘Structural Bias’ strikes again in the Marshall Islands Case. AJIL Unbound, vol. 111: Symposium on the Marshall Islands Case (2017).
BONAFÉ, Beatrice I. Establishing the existence of a dispute before the International Court of Justice: Drawbacks and implications. Questions of International Law, 45 (2017).
BORDIN, Fernando Lusa. Procedural Developments at the International Court of Justice. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16 (2017).
BRANT, Leonardo Nemer Caldeira. A autoridade da coisa julgada no Direito Internacional Público. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2002.
CARTER, Barry E.; TRIMBLE, Phillip R; BRADLEY, Curtis A. International Law, 4th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2003.
COMBACAU, Jean; SUR, Serge. Droit international public, 7e ed. Paris: Montchrestien, 2006.
DAVIS, Katherine Maddox. Hurting More than Helping: How the Marshall Islands’ Seeming Bravery Against Major Powers Only Stands to Maim the Legitimacy of the World Court. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 25:1 (2016).
DUPUY, Pierre-Marie. Droit international public, 8ème ed. Paris: Dalloz, 2006.
GALINDO, George R. B. On Form, Substance, and Equality between States. AJIL Unbound, vol. 111: Symposium on the Marshall Islands Case (2017).
KOLB, Robert. The Elgar Companion to the International Court of Justice. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (MA-USA): 2014.
KRISCH, Nico. Capitulation in The Hague: The Marshall Islands Cases. Postagem de 10.out.2016 no Blog European Journal of International Law Talk! Disponível em: < https://www.ejiltalk.org/capitulation-in-the-hague-the-marshall-islands-cases/#more-14629 >. Acesso em: 10.ago.2018.
KUMAR, Shashank P. The Marshall Islands’ Case against India’s Nuclear Weapons Program at the ICJ. Postagem em 27.jun.2014 no blog European Journal of International Law Talk! Disponível em: < https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-marshall-islands-case-against-indias-nuclear-weapons-program-at-the-icj/#more-11117 >. Acesso em 10.ago.2018.
LUPI, André Lipp Pinto Basto. Artigo 31. In: SALIBA, Aziz Tuffi. Direito dos Tratados. Comentários à Convenção de Viena sobre o Direito dos Tratados (1969). Belo Horizonte: Arraes, 2011.
MELLO, Celso R.D.A. Curso de Direito Internacional Público, vol. 2, 15ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2004
ÖBERG, Marko Divac. The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ. European Journal of International Law, vol. 16, n. 5 (2006)
PALESTINI, Lorenzo. Forget About Mavrommatis and Judicial Economy: The Alleged Absence of a Dispute in the Cases Concerning the Obligations to Negotiate the Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and Nuclear Disarmament. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2017.
PELLET, Alain. Article 38. In: ZIMMERMANN, Andreas et al. The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
POMSON, Ori. The Obligations concerning Negotiations Cases and the “Dispute” Requirement in the International Court of Justice. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 16 (2017).
PROULX, Vincent-Joël. The Marshall Islands Judgments and Multilateral Disputes at the World Court: Whither Access to International Justice? AJIL Unbound, vol. 111: Symposium on the Marshall Islands Case (2017).
______. The World Court’s Jurisdictional Formalism and its LostMarket Share: The Marshall Islands Decisions and the Quest for a Suitable Dispute Settlement Forum for Multilateral Disputes. Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 30, no. 4 (2017).
QUOC DINH, Nguyen; DAILLIER, Patrick; PELLET, Alain. Direito Internacional Público, 2ª ed. Tradução portuguesa de Vítor Marques Coelho. Lisboa: Calouste Gulbenkian, 2003
RANGANATHAN, Surabhi. Nuclear Weapons and the Court. AJIL Unbound, vol. 111: Symposium on the Marshall Islands Case (2017).
ROSENNE, Shabtai. The Perplexities of Modern International Law. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004
______. The President of the International Court of Justice. In: LOWE, Vaughan; FITZMAURICE, Malgosia (orgs.). Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice. Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
SCHMITZ, Maitê de Souza. Decision of the International Court of Justice in the Nuclear Arms Race Case. Harvard International Law Journal: Student Features. 21.nov.2016. Disponível em: < http://www.harvardilj.org/2016/11/decision-of-the-international-court-of-justice-in-the-nuclear-arms-race-case/ >. Acesso em: 10.ago.2018.
SHAW, Malcolm N. International Law, 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
STOPPIONI, Edoardo. Decentring the ICJ: A critical analysis of the Marshall Islands judgments. AJIL Unbound, vol. 111: Symposium on the Marshall Islands Case (2017).
TAMS, Christian. No Dispute About Nuclear Weapons? Postagem de 6.out.2016 no Blog European Journal of International Law Talk! Disponível em: . Acesso em: 10.ago.2018.
TOMUSCHAT, art. 36. In: ZIMMERMANN, Andreas et al. The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Jurisprudência:
ICJ. Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ Reports 2016, p. 3.
ICJ. Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2011, p. 70.
ICJ. Case concerning right of passage over Indian territory (Preliminary Objections), Judgment of November 26th, 1957: I.C. J. Reports 1957, p. 125.
ICJ. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, 1. C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.
ICJ. Militarv and Puramilitary Activities in und aguinst Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). Merits, Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 1986, p. 14.
ICJ. Northern Cameroons (Cameroon v. United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1963, p. 14.
ICJ. Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), Judgrnent, I.C.J. Reports 1974, p. 253.
ICJ. Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974, p. 457.
ICJ. Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. India), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2016, p. 255.
ICJ. Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. Pakistan), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2016, p. 552.
ICJ. Obligations Concerning Negotiations Relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ Reports 2016, p. 833.
ICJ. Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 Nautical Miles from the Nicaraguan Coast (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2016, p. 100.
ICJ. Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012, p. 422.
ICJ. South West Africa cases (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa), Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 21 December 1962, p. 319.
ICJ. South West Africa, Second Phase, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1966, p. 6.
PCIJ. Lotus. Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A – 10. September 7th, 1927.
PCIJ. The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, 1924, PCIJ, Series A, No. 2.
