THE IMPACT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE LAW - DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2019v75p419
Resumo
This article evaluates the impact of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) jurisprudence in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case law. Based on empirical and qualitative analysis, it aims to present an overview of citations patterns in ICJ case law as far as the IACtHR is concerned. Since most external citations to IACtHR case law by the ICJ are found in individual opinions, this article will also present a qualitative analysis of the most cited issues by the most active ICJ judge with a view to identifying the functions of the judicial dialogue, as developed by Anne-Marie Slaughter, which encompass (i) the general cross-fertilization function; and (ii) the function of ‘enhancing the persuasiveness, authority or legitimacy of individual judicial decisions. The article intends to assess the ICJ’s openness to judicial dialogue, in particular with the IACtHR.
KEYWORDS: Judicial Dialogue. Impact. International Court of Justice. Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
Referências
ALMEIDA, Paula Wojcikiewicz. The legitimacy of International Trade Tribunals: the case of Mercosur. In: RUIZ-FABRI, H; ULFSTEIN, G; HOWSE, R. The Legitimacy of International Trade Tribunals, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
BUERGENTHAL, Thomas; NORRIS, Robert; SHELTON, Dinah. Protecting Human Rights in the Americas, Selected Problems. N. P. Engel Publisher, 2 ed., 1986.
CROOK, John R. The International Court of Justice and Human Rights. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, v. 1, 2004.
DE BRABANDERE, Eric. The Use of Precedent and External Case-Law by the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, v. 15, n.1, 2016.
EL BOUDOUHI, Saïda. L’arrêt Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (République de Guinée c. République démocratique du Congo). La CIJ est-elle devenue une juridiction de protection des droits de l’homme? Annuaire français de droit international, v. 56, 2010.
FOSTER, Caroline E. Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals. Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof and Finality. Cambridge University Press 2011.
GIORGETTI, Chiara. Introductory Note the International Court of Justice: Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo) Compensation owed by the Democratic Republic of the Congo to the Republic of Guinea. International Legal Materials, v. 51, 2012.
HIGGINS, Rosalyn. Human Rights in the International Court of Justice. Leiden Journal of International Law, V. 20, 2007.
HOSS, Cristina. The forgotten case of Angel Francisco Breard. In: ALMEIDA, Paula Wojcikiewicz; SOREL, Jean-Marc (eds), Latin America and the ICJ: Contributions to International law. Routledge, 2016.
KLEIN, Natalie S. Multilateral Disputes and the Doctrine of Necessary Parties in the East Timor Case. Yale Journal of International Law, v. 21, n. 2, 1996.
KOH, Harold. International Law as Part of Our Law. American Journal of International Law, v.98, 2004.
LACHS Manfred H. Evidence in the Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Role of the Court. In: BELLO, Emmanuel G; AJIBOLA, Bolasodun A. (orgs.) Essays in Honour of Judge Taslim Olawale Elias, Martinus Nijhoff, 1993.
LAW, David S. Law; CHANG, Wen-Chen. The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue. Washington Law Review, v. 86, n.3, 2011.
LIMA, Lucas Carlos. The Evidential Weight of Experts before the ICJ: Reflections on the Whaling in the Antarctic Case. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, v. 6, 2015.
MAC-GREGOR, Eduardo Ferrer. What Do We Mean When We Talk about Judicial Dialogue: Reflections of a Judge of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Harvard Human Rights Journal, v. 30, 2017.
MALINTOPPI, Loretta. Fact Finding and Evidence Before the International Court of Justice (Notably in Scientific-Related Disputes). Journal of International Dispute Settlement, v. 7, 2016.
MBENGUE, Makane Moïse. International Courts and Tribunals as Fact-Finders: The Case of Scientific Fact-Finding in International Adjudication. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, v. 34, n.1, 2011.
NEUMAN, Gerald L, The External Reception of Inter-American Human Rights Law Special Edition Quebec Journal of International Law, 2011.
NUBBERGER, Angelika. ‘The ECtHR’ use of decisions of International Courts and Quasi-Judicial Bodies. In: MÜLLER, Amrei (org.). Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights, Studies on International Courts and Tribunals, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
PASQUALUCCI, Jo M. The Inter-American Human Rights System: Establishing Precedents and Procedure in Human Rights Law. Inter-American Law Review, v. 26, 1995.
PAYNE, Cymie. Mastering the Evidence: Improving Fact Finding by International Courts. Environmental Law Review, v. 41, 2011.
PETERS Anne. “Vulnerability” versus “Plausability”: Righting or Wronging the Regime of Provisional Measures? Reflections on ICJ, Ukraine v. Russian Federation, Order of 19 April 2017. EJIL: Talk! Disponível em: <https://www.ejiltalk.org/vulnerability-versus-plausibility-righting-or-wronging-the-regime-of-provisional-measures-reflections-on-icj-ukraine-v-russian-federation-order-of-19-apr/. Acesso em 18 de dezembro de 2018.
SCHARF, Michael P.; DAY, Margaux. The International Court of Justice’s Treatment of Circumstantial Evidence and Adverse Inferences. Chicago Journal of International Law, v. 13, n.1, 2012.
SIMMA, Bruno. Human Rights before the International Court of Justice: Community Interest Coming to Life? In: TAMS, Christian J, Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice. Oxford University Press, 2013.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 44, n.1, 2003.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie, A Typology of Transjudicial Communication, University of Richmond Law Review, v. 29, n. 1, 1994.
TEITELBAUM, Ruth. Recent Fact-Finding Developments at the International Court of Justice. The Law and Practice of International Court and Tribunals, v. 6, 2007.
TZANAKOPOULOS, Antonios. Judicial Dialogue as a Means of Interpretation. In: AUST, Helmut Philip; NOLTE, Georg (eds), The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts: Uniformity, Diversity, Convergence. Oxford University Press, 2016.
ULFSTEIN Geir. Awarding Compensation in a Fragmented Legal System: the Diallo Case. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, v. 4, n.3, 2013.
VOETEN, Erik, Borrowing and Nonborrowing among International Courts. The Journal of Legal Studies, v. 39, 2010.
ZYBERI, Gentian. The International Court of Justice and applied forms of reparation for international human rights and humanitarian law violations. Utrecht Law Review, v. 71, n.1, 2011.
